Colleges want to know if you are curious. But what are they really looking for, and where can you provide evidence of your curiosity?

“I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious.” 
-Albert Einstein

The Oxford English Dictionary defines CURIOSITY as “A strong desire to know or learn something.” However, current research provides a much more complex and multifaceted picture. There are different types of curiosity: epistemic, empathic, and diversive—and the motivation for each is quite different. 

First, there is epistemic curiosity. This is the drive to know more about something. For example, you know that deep, dark rabbit hole you fall into on the internet when you become obsessed to eliminate gaps of information … just because it feels satisfying? That satisfaction is your brain being stimulated by a squirt of dopamine, quenching a chemically induced thirst in your brain. Google, Netflix, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, and all the other players know exactly how to stimulate and feed your epistemic curiosity, but fortunately colleges won’t be evaluating your Google search history. However, when you are driven to know more about “the right things” and feed that kind of specific curiosity (e.g. – when to use an SN2 reaction in organic chemistry, when Boolean logic is appropriate, or why the ideal gas law is so awesome)—that kind of curiosity is labeled as productive learning, and colleges want to see evidence of that behavior.

“Much of what I stumbled into by following my curiosity and intuition 
turned out to be priceless later on.” 
– Steve Jobs

The second type of curiosity, empathic, is the drive to know other people and understand how they think and feel. When you build relationships and are comfortable in your empathic ventures, it is psychologically and physically pleasurable. Again, research has found this empathetic state and the drive to reproduce the feeling is driven by high releases of dopamine. Colleges also look for evidence of this type of curiosity in applicants’ essays, letters of recommendation, and in the extracurriculars you choose to participate. Why? Because socially successful and empathetic-rich students are often more successful in college, in and out of the classroom.

“In business it’s about people. It’s about relationships.” 
– Kathy Ireland

There is also a third type of “curiosity” that some researchers have suggested—diversive curiosity. This is when you search your phone looking for new messages just to keep from actually thinking or reflecting about something of value. But colleges aren’t concerned with your need for likes or your Twitter feed desires. My suggestion—derail that habit and evoke your epistemic curiosity instead.

“A few years ago, users of internet services began to realize that 
when an online service is free, you’re not the customer. 
You’re the product.” 
– Tim Cook

Okay, so there are three kinds of curiosity, but what kind of curiosity are schools looking for, and why?

Colleges are struggling with a new era of applicant evaluations that does not include standardized testing metrics, most notably the SAT and ACT. Metrics are safe. Evaluations can be justified with reference to a number. This includes numbers that are known to provide spurious correlations—such as higher SAT scores = greater college success—that have buoyed inequitable evaluations for college admission and financial aid awards for decades. Moreover, The College Board and standardized tests are currently falling out of favor for many reasons, including access inequity during COVID. It is hard to take a test if your area doesn’t provide one and you can’t travel to take it. For that reason, colleges are anxiously looking for other indicators of future college success. Enter the search for natural, self-driven, curious students.

Colleges are looking for students who can provide evidence for being self-driven learners. Do you ask questions and does your curiosity drive you to learn on your own? Do you find opportunities outside the classroom such as internships, jobs, and opportunities to mentor? Most of our education system is based on responding to someone else’s questions and agenda, but that isn’t what many industries need or want. There is a growing need for those who can ask better questions and look for innovative solutions, on their own. College are looking to steward such students.

Schools are increasingly searching for students who take ownership of their education and apply their learning beyond the classroom. For example, a student that learns to code and then applies that knowledge to solve a community need or to share their new skills by teaching other students, has moved from Bloom’s taxonomy of merely understanding knowledge, to the application and synthesis levels of understanding. Colleges have observed that students with these curiosity-driven learning/application/synthesis behaviors become the most academically and socially successful at their schools.

Curiosity is surely embedded deep in the nature vs. nurture spectrum—partially inherited, and some learned. Like most behaviors, curiosity is likely a combination of many different factors including genetic predisposition, environment, practice, and encouragement. But no matter why a student exhibits curiosity, colleges are looking for evidence in essays, resumes, and letters of recommendation that show an applicant is exercising that muscle.

As an educator I strive to engage students and inspire their curiosity; however, you can lead a student to a good quandary, but you can’t make them think. Some students are naturally curious. Or are they? Nearly all the best scientists and engineers I have worked with ask questions and are driven to find answers. Almost to a person, they note this behavior was either practiced by their family, a family member, or a mentor/teacher who challenged them to ask questions and seek useful answers. While there may be a genetic predisposition to be curious, the habit is a learned—and often modeled—behavior.

Being curious is simply asking questions. The scientific method is, foundationally, asking questions in a systematic format. Questions can be inspired by the surrounding world, other people, or a new piece of information or experience. However, cognitive dissonance (when the brain is faced with a situation that does not match current understanding or expectation) there are two options: dismiss the misalignment, or seek to understand. Colleges have mounting evidence that suggest that students who naturally seek to understand and cannot allow cognitive dissonance to exist are academically more successful. They are looking for students who like to think.

All areas of STEM industry are founded on asking questions—being curious. Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Good scientists continuously ask these questions about everything. The next step is developing a way to answer questions in a clear, concise, and cogent method. The scientific method is one systematic way to do just that. However, daily life is filled with questions and problems that successful people answer and solve. Students applying to college will be much more competitive if they just practice being more curious.

“Learning is by nature, curiosity.” 
– Plato

For more information about curiosity and how to develop it, you might enjoy:
Britannica’s Curiosity Quiz

Astrophysicist and curiosity addict, Mario Livio’s book – 
Why? What Makes Us Curious.

A formula for asking good questions: Warren Berger’s book – 
A More Beautiful Question.